Back
Knowledge

How to Make Veeva's Update Cycle Work for You – Not Against You

Learn how to make Veeva's release cycle work for your team. Expert insights on structure, governance, and risk-based validation from our Unlocking the Vault webinar series.

How to Make Veeva's Update Cycle Work for You – Not Against You

Many teams treat each Veeva release like starting from scratch. The result? Updates get skipped, validation becomes overwhelming, and teams fall further behind with each cycle. Systems drift out of sync with business needs, and adoption slows.

We recently explored this challenge in our Unlocking the Vault webinar series, bringing together experts to discuss how teams can take control of their release cycle. 

The message was consistent: the updates aren't the issue. It's how they're handled.

Releases aren't the problem. Lack of structure is.

Veeva's update cadence is predictable. Still, many teams approach each release reactively – as if it's the first time.

As Hannah Greiner, Director of Strategy & Business Consulting at Epista, put it:

"Release management is often treated like a one-off project. That's where things start to break down. You need a structure you can reuse so you don't start from scratch every time."

When ownership is unclear and responsibilities are scattered, even small updates become disruptive. The process loses momentum, and releases turn into compliance checklists rather than opportunities to improve how the system is used.

Clear roles make the difference

Efficient release management depends on three things: structure, ownership, and collaboration. In practice, the work typically splits across three tracks:

  1. Technical: system admins, integrations, configurations
  2. Compliance: validation impact assessments, documentation, SOPs
  3. Business: alignment with actual use and processes

Business ownership is often the missing piece. As Hannah said:

"If there's no business ownership – no one steering where the platform should go – you risk treating every release as a compliance check, instead of a chance to improve operations."

But clarity around roles is just the starting point. Teams also need to understand what type of release they're working with – and how to respond accordingly.

Know what kind of release you're working with

Not all updates are the same. Veeva categorizes them into three types:

General releases: delivered by Veeva, with platform or suite-level changes

Project releases: customer-driven, linked to new processes or capabilities

Operational releases: smaller tweaks, fixes or optimizations

Each type requires a different approach. Recognizing that helps teams avoid unnecessary validation – and ensures important changes don't go unnoticed.

Use what Veeva already provides

Every release comes with a full set of documentation: validation plans, requirement specifications, traceability matrices, OQ and regression tests, known issues, and more.

Haik Gazarian, Head of Quality at Epista, highlighted how underused these resources often are:

"Veeva is doing a lot of the heavy lifting. If you're duplicating their effort with your own full-scale validation every time, you're solving for compliance – but in an inefficient way."

Instead of building everything from scratch, use these materials as your starting point. It reduces time, avoids duplication, and makes room for more targeted validation where it's actually needed.

Validate what matters

Validation isn't about doing everything. It's about doing the right things well.

"You don't need to revalidate what hasn't changed," Haik said. "Focus on the deltas."

That means trusting your own impact assessments. If a change has no effect on your intended use, you don't need to spend time validating it. A risk-based approach doesn't mean taking risks – it means making informed decisions.

Make the most of the eight weeks

Each Veeva release follows the same rhythm. About eight weeks before deployment, you get access to release notes, sandbox environments, and supporting materials. That gives you time to prepare.

A strong release process includes:

  • Reusable change control and impact templates
  • Named roles across technical, compliance, and business
  • Clear documentation and training plans
  • Governance that brings IT and business together

Neel Patel, Principal Consultant, Technology, pointed out:

"You need both a bottom-up and top-down view. Business users know what's impacted. Governance ensures that one vault's changes don't create problems for others."

Where are you today?

Most teams fall into one of three patterns:

  1. Heavy regression testing every time – safe, but time-consuming
  2. Partially risk-based – moving in the right direction, but inconsistently
  3. Harmonized with Veeva's approach – predictable, lean, and scalable

The difference isn't technical skill – it's process. The most effective teams align their release model with Veeva's and build their validation around what's already provided.

It's not about rushing through updates. It's about reducing the noise so you can focus on the changes that really matter.

Release management is a business capability

Treating releases as isolated tasks makes them harder to manage – and more likely to be postponed. But with the right structure, aligned roles and a predictable rhythm, release management becomes just another part of how your business runs.

Done right, it keeps your platform current, compliant, and aligned with your organization's goals.

Next up in the series: 

Our second webinar explores what happens when your system and your business evolve in different directions. Join us as we look at how to close that gap and keep your Vault aligned with real-world needs.


Talk to an expert

Hannah Greiner
Director, Strategy & Business Consulting
Contact
Linkedin

Explore other articles

Get in touch

We enjoy sharing our knowledge. Get in touch to find out how Epista can add value to your Life Science company.